Impact of Vascular Variations of Superior Mesenteric Artery During Complete Mesocolic Excision for Right Colon Cancer

Résumé fourni par la source

Background: Looking for anomalies and vascular control gains a central role in colon cancer surgery. Complete mesocolic excision (CME) presents technical challenges, primarily due to the considerable variability in the arterial configuration of the right colon. The importance of understanding colonic vascular anatomy has become more prominent with the adoption of this surgical technique. The aim of this study is to systematically review the vascular anatomical variations in the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) in the setting of extended lymphadenectomy for CME in right colon cancer and to show its impact in clinical practice. Methods: A systematic review of the literature on Medline (PubMed), Web of Science (WOS), and Scopus was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. The following criteria were set for inclusion: (1) studies reporting minimally invasive (robotic, laparoscopic, and hybrid techniques) or open CME/D3 lymphadenectomy; (2) studies reporting patients with right-sided colon cancer; (3) studies reporting the description or illustration of SMA variations. The methodological quality of all included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS). Results: After the literature search, 800 studies were recorded, 31 studies underwent full-text reviews, and 9 studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies reported vascular variations in SMA, and the total number of patients was 813. No intraoperative complications were reported. In 6.4% of patients, post-operative bleeding occurred. Conclusions: Vascular anatomical variations are not a rare entity. In experienced centers, vascular anomalies are not associated with an increase in complications, both in traditional open and minimally invasive surgery (MIS). However, in MIS, full access to central vessels and intraoperative vascular control, moderate retraction, safety maneuvers, and accurate vascular dissection are mandatory.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.