Automatic cervical tumors segmentation in PET/MRI by parallel encoder U-net
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Automatic segmentation of cervical tumors is important in quantitative analysis and radiotherapy planning. METHODS: A parallel encoder U-Net (PEU-Net) integrating the multi-modality information of PET/MRI was proposed to segment cervical tumor, which consisted of two parallel encoders with the same structure for PET and MR images. The features of the two modalities were extracted separately and fused at each layer of the decoder. Res2Net module on skip connection aggregated the features of various scales and refined the segmentation performance. PET/MRI images of 165 patients with cervical cancer were included in this study. U-Net, TransUNet, and nnU-Net with single or multi-modality (PET or/and T2WI) input were used for comparison. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) with volume data, DSC and the 95th percentile of Hausdorff distance (HD95) with tumor slices were calculated to evaluate the performance. RESULTS: (0.871 ± 0.113) was comparable to the best result of TransUNet with PET/MRI (0.873 ± 0.125). CONCLUSIONS: The networks with multi-modality input outperformed those with single-modality images as input. The results showed that the proposed PEU-Net could use multi-modality information more effectively through the redesigned structure and achieved competitive performance.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Automatic cervical tumors segmentation in PET/MRI by parallel encoder U-net
- Date Crossref
- 05/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.