Adolescents’ knowledge, attitude and perceived risks towards e-cigarette usage in Johor Bahru, Malaysia

Résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate adolescents' knowledge, attitude, and risk perceptions regarding e-cigarette usage and examine the associations and differences across various socio-demographic characteristics. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in two government secondary schools in Johor. A total of 391 respondents were enrolled conveniently using a pre-validated questionnaire. The data were analysed using SPSS descriptive and inferential statistics. RESULTS: Most participants demonstrated a moderate level of knowledge regarding e-cigarettes (77.5 %), achieving an average score of 3.82 (±0.89). A significant portion of the respondents were female (56.3 %) and Chinese (57.5 %), predominantly aged between 16 and 17 years (53.7 %). Presently, 11.5 % of the participants reported using e-cigarettes, while 6.6 % reported using traditional tobacco cigarettes. Notably, 12.3 % of adolescents correctly identified nicotine as a common component in e-cigarettes, highlighting its addictive nature. Furthermore, significant association and differences were observed between e-cigarette usage and a positive attitude towards them (86.7 %, p<0.001), as well as the perception of reduced health risks associated with e-cigarette consumption (9.11 ± 2.68, p<0.001). Adolescents who were susceptible to e-cigarette use were more inclined to support their usage (63.1 %, p<0.001) and perceived fewer health consequences (6.91 + 3.12, p=0.019) in comparison to those who were not susceptible. CONCLUSIONS: E-cigarette users exhibited a moderate level of understanding along with a positive stance towards e-cigarettes, viewing them as less risky compared to non-e-cigarette users. As a result, collaborative endeavours are essential to enhance adolescent knowledge about e-cigarettes via community outreach initiatives. Consequently, all governing bodies must explore effective strategies to tackle this issue by implementing strict legislation.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.