A Phase II Study of Cabozantinib in Patients With MET-Altered Lung Cancers
Rattachement africain : us, br. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: -altered NSCLCs. Preclinically, type II TKIs, such as cabozantinib, can rescue progression on type I TKIs. This phase 2 trial (NCT01639508) evaluated the activity of cabozantinib in patients with MET-dependent lung cancers, including TKI-pretreated cancers. Methods: -altered lung cancers with cabozantinib (60 mg daily) until progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). We prespecified that cabozantinib would be considered a useful agent if at least a 20% ORR was observed. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Results: exon 14 alteration and amplification. There were 24 patients (86%) previously treated with a type I MET TKI. The ORR was 20% (5/25 assessable patients; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.9%-39.1%), with five partial responses (duration ranged from 4 to 39 mo). Four of five responders were type I MET TKI pretreated. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.5 (95% CI: 3.3-5.7) months and 7.2 (95% CI: 2.9-11.5) months, respectively. Dose modification and discontinuation occurred in 64% (18/28) and 7% (2/28) of patients, respectively. Conclusion: This trial met its primary end point. Importantly, we demonstrated that cabozantinib, a type II MET TKI, could benefit patients with MET-altered lung cancers previously treated with type I MET TKIs.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A Phase II Study of Cabozantinib in Patients With MET-Altered Lung Cancers
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.