Systemic immune response alteration in patients with severe pressure ulcers
Rattachement africain : es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Wound healing is a dynamic process involving tissue formation, debris removal and ultimately remodeling to restore skin integrity. Although wound healing is generally successful, this process can eventually fail, leading to chronic wounds like pressure ulcers (PUs), whose presence/absence has been considered by WHO as good indicator of patient's wellbeing and care quality. PUs are stratified into grades I to IV grades based on their severity, however, the existence of systemic markers predicting their clinical progression remains unexplored. Here, we performed a serum proteomic and transcriptomic profiling of 54 patients with PUs ranging from grade II to grade III-IV. Unsupervised clustering identified a distinctive immune-related proteomic and transcriptomic blood profile in high-grade PUs. Specifically, pathways controlled by inflammatory-linked genes such as IER3, TSLP, and TNFAIP6 (TSG-6) were found to be upregulated in high-grade PUs, together with a reduction in the levels of potent immunomodulators such as IL-10, IFNγ, MCP-2/CCL8, and CXCL-10 in serum from grade III-IV PUs patients. All together, indicating an altered inflammatory state in advanced PUs. This study provides novel insights regarding the use of omic approaches to find potential systemic biomarkers for the prediction of severity in PUs and could help to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the chronic progression of this pathology.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Systemic immune response alteration in patients with severe pressure ulcers
- Date Crossref
- 04/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.