Non-Traumatic Abdominal Surgical Emergencies at the Kolondiéba Referral Health Center (MALI)
Résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: The aim of this study was to determine the epidemioclinical profile and evaluate the management of non-traumatic abdominal surgical emergencies. Methodology: This was a retrospective, descriptive, cross-sectional study from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024. All patients treated for a non-traumatic abdominal surgical emergency in the general surgery unit of the kolondiéba referral health center were included. Results: We managed 201 non-traumatic abdominal surgical emergencies, representing 29.6% of surgical procedures (n:677) and 84% of abdominal surgical emergencies (n:239). Mean age was 30.56 years, with extremes of 1 year and 81 years. The majority of patients were male (61.2%). Housewives and farmers were in the majority, with 33.8% and 26.3% respectively. Average duration was 113 hours. Abdominal pain was present in (98%), vomiting (93.5%), and cessation of matter and gas (39.8%). Ultrasound and radiography of the abdomen without preparation had been performed in (59.7%) and (27.8%) respectively. The etiologies most frequently encountered were acute appendicitis (28.3%) and acute generalized peritonitis (26.3%), with 16% of complications dominated by parietal suppurations (11%), and a mortality rate of 3%. The average length of hospital stay was 8.2 days. Conclusion: Non-traumatic surgical emergencies are frequent and associated with a high complication rate at the center. Improving the technical level in terms of personnel and equipment could help improve prognosis.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Non-Traumatic Abdominal Surgical Emergencies at the Kolondiéba Referral Health Center (MALI)
- Date Crossref
- 24/05/2025
- Éditeur
- SASPR Edu International Pvt. Ltd
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.