Crises and complexity: how can we make health interventions succeed?
Rattachement africain : gb, us, kh. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The end of the COVID-19 global health emergency presents an opportunity to reflect on actions needed to enhance the effectiveness of responses to any future shocks. We highlight critical areas requiring attention from researchers and research commissioners to enhance the identification and adoption of 'good value' interventions, and we discuss the complexities of evidence-informed decision-making across multiple sectors, the evolving role of modeling, and the need for improved stakeholder engagement and institutional coordination to effectively address interconnected health and policy challenges. We conclude the commentary by making a set of related recommendations to support intervention identification and implementation. Researchers, policymakers, and other key stakeholders should: renew efforts to step out of silos and to develop methods and frameworks that link and synthesize evidence from multiple sources and perspectives, to support planetary health goals and the 'One Health' concept; support more research into understanding the constraints to adopting interventions regarded as good value for money, to enhance evaluation methods ex ante and to better inform systems and stakeholders of the implementation requirements; and maintain an ongoing commitment to equitable research partnerships to ensure that evidence use is relevant for the target settings.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Crises and complexity: how can we make health interventions succeed?
- Date Crossref
- 04/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.