Clinical effectiveness of esophageal stricture dilation using an improved endoscopic attachment cap in adults with eosinophilic esophagitis
Rattachement africain : ch, at. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: The improved endoscopic attachment cap has the following new features: 1) more rounded tip; 2) stepwise dilation in two 1-mm increments; 3) softer plastic, ensuring better contact with the endoscope tip; and 4) improved adhesive tape. We evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of one-time esophageal stricture dilation using the new device in adults with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Methods: Patients prospectively included in the Swiss EoE cohort with esophageal strictures (diameter ≤16 mm) and stricture-related symptoms underwent dilation with the new device. Symptoms were assessed using the Eosinophilic Esophagitis Activity Index patient-reported outcomes instrument before and 2 weeks after a single dilation. Results: 60 patients (median age 42 years; 75% male) were evaluated. Bougienage was successful in all patients. Median esophageal diameter increased from 12 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 11–14) to 16 mm (IQR 14–16; P < 0.001). Median symptom severity dropped from 36 points (IQR 22–62) to 0 (IQR 0–12; P < 0.001). No device became detached and no severe adverse events were reported. Post-dilation pain was recorded in 31.7% (19/60). Conclusions: Esophageal stricture dilation in adults with EoE using the improved endoscopic attachment cap was feasible, clinically effective, and environmentally friendly.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Clinical effectiveness of esophageal stricture dilation using an improved endoscopic attachment cap in adults with eosinophilic esophagitis
- Date Crossref
- 04/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.