Inappropriate review comments on egusphere-2025-937
Rattachement africain : gb, is, fr, us, de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract. The 2021 Fagradalsfjall fissure eruption was the first of ongoing eruptions in the most densely populated part of Iceland (70 % of population within 50 km). It was monitored by an exceptionally dense reference-grade air quality network (14 stations within 40 km), and the first time that a reference-grade timeseries of PM1 was collected during an eruption. We used these measurements to identify fine-scale dispersion patterns of volcanic air pollutants (SO2, PM1, PM2.5, PM10) in populated areas. Despite its small size the eruption caused a statistically-significant increase in average and peak PM and SO2 concentrations in at least 300 km distance. Peak daily-means of PM1 peak rose to 18–20 µg/m3 from 5–6 µg/m3; and proportion of PM1 increased relative to coarser PM fractions (21–24 % of PM10 compared to 14 % background). Eruption increased PM10 and PM2.5 by ~50 % in populated areas with low background concentrations, but its impact was not measurable in areas with high background sources. This suggests that ash-poor eruptions are one of, or the most, important source of PM1 in Iceland, and potentially in other areas exposed to volcanic emissions. There were significant fine-scale temporal (≤1 hour) and spatial (<1 km) fluctuations in volcanic pollutant concentrations. In Reykjavík, two stations located <1 km of each other recorded peak hourly-mean concentrations of 480 and 250 µg/m3 SO2, and 5 and 0 exceedance events, respectively, within a ~12-hour plume advection event. This has implications for population exposures estimates.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Inappropriate review comments on egusphere-2025-937
- Date Crossref
- 02/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Copernicus GmbH
- Type
- peer-review
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.