Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Post-Thoracentesis Ultrasound Versus Chest Radiography for the Evaluation of Effusion Evacuation and Lung Reexpansion: A Multicenter Study

2Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
29Institutions déclarées
3Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us, cn, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Rationale Post-thoracentesis chest radiography (CXR) is often used to evaluate the degree of residual fluid after thoracentesis. Whether post-drainage ultrasound examination is comparable to CXR in the evaluation of pleural space evacuation is unknown. Objectives How do post-thoracentesis ultrasound and CXR compare in assessing the effectiveness of pleural space evacuation? Methods In this prospective, multicenter study, patients with free-flowing pleural effusions with minimal to no septations requiring thoracentesis were recruited. Post-thoracentesis ultrasound was performed immediately postprocedure; CXR was performed within 4 hours postprocedure. The primary outcome was agreement on complete pleural space evacuation between ultrasound and CXR. Complete pleural space evacuation was defined as the absence of pleural fluid on anterior, midaxillary, and posterior ultrasound views and lack of costophrenic angle blunting on CXR. Interobserver reliability was assessed via independent image reviews by two pulmonologists and two radiologists blinded to patient and procedure data, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Results Of the 147 patients enrolled (February 2021–May 2022), 145 were included in the final analysis. The median age was 64 years (56–75), and malignancy was the most frequent effusion etiology (n = 49). The lung was considered trapped in 50% (n = 73). A total of 826 ultrasound images were collected for blind review. The Gwet’s agreement coefficient 1 assessing complete pleural evacuation between ultrasound and CXR was 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83–1.00). When assessing agreement on the basis of pre-specified criteria of effusion size (small vs. large), a substantial level of agreement was observed between ultrasound and CXR, indicated by a kappa of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.51–0.77). There was strong agreement (kappa = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71–0.90) between proceduralist and blind ultrasound reviewers regarding complete pleural space evacuation. Conclusions Post-thoracentesis ultrasound is an equally effective alternative to CXR in evaluating pleural space evacuation in simple pleural effusions.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Post-Thoracentesis Ultrasound Versus Chest Radiography for the Evaluation of Effusion Evacuation and Lung Reexpansion: A Multicenter Study
Date Crossref
01/09/2025
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Ultrasound in Clinical ApplicationsRadiation Dose and ImagingLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.