Differences in Aqueous Humor Cytokine Concentrations According to the Presence of Posterior Subcapsular Cataract: A Prospective Case-Control Study
Rattachement africain : kr, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Posterior subcapsular cataract (PSC) substantially impacts visual function, and prior studies have suggested that inflammatory cytokines may have a role in its development. We aimed to analyze inflammatory cytokine concentrations in the aqueous humor by cataract type and severity, specifically comparing them in relation to the presence of PSC, and to identify risk factors for PSC. METHODS: We prospectively recruited patients undergoing routine cataract surgery. PSC presence was documented via slit-lamp examination and anterior segment photography during cataract diagnosis. Aqueous humor samples were collected prior to surgery and analyzed using quantitative multiplexed antibody assays to measure the concentrations of 10 inflammatory cytokines (interferon-α [IFN-α], IFN-γ, interleukin [IL]-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor-α). Cytokine concentrations were compared according to PSC status. RESULTS: = .013). No significant correlation was observed between PSC status and the aqueous humor concentrations of other examined inflammatory cytokines. CONCLUSION: IFN-γ expression tended to be higher in eyes with PSC than in those without PSC, suggesting a possible role in PSC pathophysiology.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Differences in Aqueous Humor Cytokine Concentrations According to the Presence of Posterior Subcapsular Cataract: A Prospective Case-Control Study
- Date Crossref
- 29/05/2025
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.