The interplay and divergence between measurement of loneliness and lack of social support – results from a questionnaire survey
Rattachement africain : dk. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Loneliness and lack of social support are theoretically distinguished phenomena, but simultaneously overlap and mutually influence each other, challenging the measurement of these phenomena within health research. OBJECTIVE: To contribute to the understanding of the interplay and divergence of loneliness and lack of social support by investigating the convergent validity between two social support questionnaires and a loneliness questionnaire, in a population of patients treated for cardiac disease. METHOD: In total, 573 patients >18 years of age treated for cardiac disease were approached from October 2022 to May 2023 and answered two social support questionnaires and one loneliness questionnaire, and 365 patients (63.7%) completed the questionnaire. The interplay and divergence between loneliness and lack of social support were assessed by calculating convergent validity between the questionnaires. RESULTS: = 0.317-0.601, suggesting a dynamic interplay between social support and loneliness, yet also a challenge for maintaining conceptual and measurement-based divergence. CONCLUSION: This finding implies that, although loneliness and lack of social support are conceptually distinct, differentiating between these dimensions in a questionnaire survey is challenging.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The interplay and divergence between measurement of loneliness and lack of social support – results from a questionnaire survey
- Date Crossref
- 29/05/2025
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.