Update to the role of staging laparoscopy in the assessment of resectability of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: have improvements in cross-sectional and functional imaging rendered it redundant?
Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
INTRODUCTION: F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computerised tomography (FDG PET-CT) has been incorporated into staging, prompting reassessment of staging laparoscopy's role in determining resectability. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed patients referred with suspected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma to a UK hepatobiliary centre between 2020 and 2024 (n = 304). Those with potentially resectable disease on conventional CT and MRI were compared to a matched 2016-2019 cohort (n = 57). RESULTS: Between 2020 and 2024, CT and MRI identified inoperable disease in 248/304 patients. FDG PET-CT further excluded 16/56 patients. Staging laparoscopy in 40 patients excluded 5. Among 35 proceeding to laparotomy, 33 completed curative-intent resection. In 2016-2019, all 57 underwent staging laparoscopy, excluding 9. Of 48 proceeding to laparotomy, 40 completed resection. CONCLUSIONS: Advances in cross-sectional imaging, including FDG PET-CT, have improved radiological staging. However, at 1-in-8, the diagnostic yield of staging laparoscopy remains high, justifying its continued role in evaluating resectability.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Update to the role of staging laparoscopy in the assessment of resectability of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: have improvements in cross-sectional and functional imaging rendered it redundant?
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.