Frequency of Audiology Testing Among Individuals with Osteogenesis Imperfecta and Suggestions for Improving Audiogram Participation
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), characterized by brittle bones and frequent fractures, often manifests with earlier onset hearing loss compared with the general population. Purpose: This study aims to assess the frequency of audiology testing in OI individuals and evaluate a portable audiometry device to enhance audiogram participation. Research Design: This is a prospective observational study. Study Sample: Ninety-seven participants were prospectively enrolled. Data Collection and Analysis: Participants underwent a one-time audiology test using SHOEBOX Audiometry Pro with RadioEar DD450 circumaural headphones (Clearwater Clinical Limited, Ottawa, ON, Canada). Hearing loss was defined as having a pure tone threshold (PTT) of ≥25 dB at one or more tested frequencies. Results: Most participants (54/97) reported undergoing professional audiology testing less often than once every 2 years. The most common reported reason for infrequent testing was because patients did not perceive issues with their hearing, even if hearing loss was subsequently found during screening. Seventy-one percent (69/97) of participants had hearing loss (PTT ≥ 25 dB) at one or more frequencies. Conclusions: Using a portable audiometry device in OI clinics could facilitate early hearing loss detection and improve follow-up care, enhancing quality of life.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Frequency of Audiology Testing Among Individuals with Osteogenesis Imperfecta and Suggestions for Improving Audiogram Participation
- Date Crossref
- 01/05/2025
- Éditeur
- American Academy of Audiology
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.