A case of dural arteriovenous fistula showing high uptake on methionine positron emission tomography and mimicking diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula (dAVF) and gliomas sometimes present with similar imaging findings. Methionine positron emission tomography (MET-PET) is used to diagnose gliomas; however, the findings for dAVF are unknown. Case report We report the case of a 59-year-old man who presented with headaches and diplopia. Magnetic resonance imaging showed edema and dilated blood vessels in the pons. The same area had a gadolinium contrast enhancement effect, and MET-PET showed high uptake. Imaging findings suggested diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma with a developmental venous anomaly. However, cerebral angiography revealed a dAVF on the posterior surface of the left petrous bone that had flowed back into the transpontine vein. A shunt ligation was performed. Postoperatively, the symptoms disappeared, and the transpontine vein was thrombosed. Conclusion dAVF can cause high MET-PET uptake; therefore, treatment for patients with suspected diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas should also consider the vasculature surrounding the lesion. In our case, the characteristic imaging finding of a dilated transpontine vein was observed; however, the prognosis was good without requiring postoperative anticoagulants.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A case of dural arteriovenous fistula showing high uptake on methionine positron emission tomography and mimicking diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.