Cesarean Section Versus Vaginal Delivery: Analysis of Risks and Benefits - A Brief Review

Résumé fourni par la source

The choice of delivery route remains one of the most debated topics in contemporary obstetrics. In Brazil, cesarean sections account for over 55% of births, exceeding the World Health Organization’s recommended rate of 10–15%. Although indispensable in situations of maternal–fetal risk, elective cesarean without clinical indication is associated with higher rates of puerperal infection, hemorrhage, anesthetic complications, and prolonged hospitalization, as well as adverse outcomes in subsequent pregnancies—such as placenta accreta and uterine rupture. In contrast, vaginal delivery, by respecting the physiology of birth, promotes faster maternal recovery, less blood loss, effective neonatal respiratory adaptation, and earlier establishment of bonding and breastfeeding. However, sociocultural factors, fear of pain, hospital convenience, and professional influence contribute to the prevalence of elective cesareans. It is concluded that balancing surgical technology with obstetric physiology requires public policies focused on humanization, multidisciplinary training, and female empowerment to ensure safe and positive birth experiences. Systematic implementation of obstetric quality indicators such as the Robson classification and incorporation of continuing‐education courses that reinforce evidence based practice are recommended. Strengthening primary care, expanding normal birth centers, and providing psychological support during pregnancy are additional key components.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.