Association between fibrinogen levels and prognosis in critically bleeding patients: exploration of the optimal therapeutic threshold
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Severe bleeding is a leading cause of ICU admission and mortality. Fibrinogen plays a crucial role in prognosis, yet optimal thresholds and supplementation targets remain unclear. METHOD: Patients with major bleeding were extracted from the MIMIC-IV database. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) identified the optimal pre-treatment fibrinogen threshold, and propensity score matching adjusted for confounders. Multiple analytical methods, including multivariable regression and machine learning models, were applied. Post-treatment fibrinogen levels were stratified based on guideline recommendations, and Cox regression assessed survival outcomes. RESULTS: Among 7,063 patients (6,666 survivors, 397 non-survivors), RCS analysis revealed a nonlinear relationship between pre-treatment fibrinogen and ICU mortality (P-non-linear < 0.001), with a threshold at 1.3 g/L. Patients with Fib > 1.3 g/L had a significant 28-day survival benefit (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.48-0.87, p < 0.01). Post-treatment stratification showed that fibrinogen ≥ 1.3 g/L was associated with improved survival (p < 0.01). RCS analysis identified an optimal post-treatment target of 2.0-2.5 g/L. CONCLUSION: Fibrinogen levels are predictive of ICU outcomes in massive hemorrhage. A pre-treatment threshold of 1.3 g/L indicates poor prognosis, while post-treatment levels of 2.0-2.5 g/L may optimize survival.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Association between fibrinogen levels and prognosis in critically bleeding patients: exploration of the optimal therapeutic threshold
- Date Crossref
- 23/05/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.