Effectiveness of dietary prehabilitation among patients with gastric, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers: a systematic review
Rattachement africain : pl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
INTRODUCTION: Gastric, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers pose a serious health challenge, characterized by high morbidity and mortality rates. Dietary prehabilitation, aimed at optimizing nutritional status before treatment, has proven to be a promising strategy for improving outcomes. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of dietary prehabilitation in improving clinical outcomes, including nutritional status, length of hospital stay, and quality of life in patients with gastric, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials and observational studies in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases searched included Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, and Google Scholar. RESULTS: Twelve studies focusing on pretreatment dietary interventions were identified. Dietary prehabilitation, particularly using oral nutritional supplements or immunonutrition, reduced postoperative complications and improved nutritional status, especially in malnourished patients. CONCLUSIONS: Dietary prehabilitation appears to benefit patients with gastric, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers, particularly in terms of postoperative outcomes and nutritional status.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Effectiveness of dietary prehabilitation among patients with gastric, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers: a systematic review
- Date Crossref
- 22/05/2025
- Éditeur
- "Medycyna Praktyczna" Spolka Jawna
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.