Real world outcomes with elotuzumab-based therapies for patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma: a Mayo Clinic experience
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Elotuzumab (Elo) is a monoclonal antibody (MoAb) targeting SLAMF7 that has improved overall survival (OS) in combination with the immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) lenalidomide (len) or pomalidomide (pom) and dexamethasone (D), in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the ELOQUENT 2 and 3 trials, respectively [ 1 , 2 ]. However, in ELOQUENT 2, patients were not len-refractory or previously treated with daratumumab (Dara) and in ELOQUENT 3, <5% of patients were previously treated with Dara and none were pom-refractory [ 3 , 4 ]. The majority of patients on these trials received 1–3 prior lines of therapy (LOT) and none were triple-class refractory (TCR). The efficacy of Elo+IMiD-based regimens in RRMM patients that are IMiD, Dara-, or TCR and have received >3 prior LOT are poorly characterized. Furthermore, clinical trials evaluating Elo-based regimens in heavily pretreated RRMM patients are lacking given the advent of highly efficacious T-cell mediated therapies such as chimeric-antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell and bispecific antibodies (BsAb) which have revolutionized the treatment of RRMM [ 5 ]. In this retrospective analysis, we aim to evaluate the real-world efficacy and the clinical outcomes of RRMM patients treated with Elo+ImiD+Dex regimens across the 3-site Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center (MCCC).
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Real world outcomes with elotuzumab-based therapies for patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma: a Mayo Clinic experience
- Date Crossref
- 23/05/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.