Pneumococcal density and respiratory co-detection in severe pediatric pneumonia in Laos
Résumé fourni par la source
There is growing evidence on the importance of bacterial/viral interaction in the course of pneumonia. In Laos, no study has investigated respiratory pathogen co-detection. We conducted a study at Mahosot Hospital in Vientiane to determine whether bacterial/viral co-detection and pneumococcal density are associated with severe pneumonia. Between December 2013 and December 2016, 934 under 5 years old hospitalized children with ARI were enrolled. Swabs from the upper respiratory tract were collected and analyzed by real-time PCR. The most common co-detected microorganisms were Streptococcus pneumoniae/Haemophilus influenzae (24%), Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)/S. pneumoniae (12%) and RSV/H. influenzae (16%). Pneumococcal density was 4.52 times higher in influenza virus positive participants. RSV/S. pneumoniae and RSV/H. influenzae co-detections were positively associated with severe pneumonia in univariate analysis (OR 1.86, 95%CI:1.22-2.81, p = 0.003 and OR 2.09, 95%CI:1.46-3.00), but not confirmed in adjusted analysis (aOR 0.72, 95%CI:0.38-1.6, p = 0.309 and aOR 1.37, 95%CI:0.73-2.58). In RSV positive patients, there was no association between pneumococcal density and severe pneumonia. Our findings confirmed an association between pneumococcal density and influenza but not RSV severe pneumonia in young children. Results highlight the complexity of the interaction of viral/bacterial pathogens, which might not have a simple synergistic action in the evolution of pneumonia.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Pneumococcal density and respiratory co-detection in severe pediatric pneumonia in Laos
- Date Crossref
- 21/05/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.