Impact of Trauma Team Census on Patients With Rib Fractures
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Workloads of healthcare professionals have continued to increase in recent years. With increased workload, some studies have shown increased length of stay for patients, higher cost, and higher risk of patient safety events. Trauma teams are a group that is particularly vulnerable to changes in patient census. This study aims to evaluate the impact of high versus low trauma team census on outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of all rib fracture patients at a level I trauma center from 2017 to 2022 was conducted. The average daily census was determined, and high or low census days were assessed by being above or below this, respectively. The impact of census levels on outcomes was assessed using bivariate analysis and multivariate regression. RESULTS: A total of 1,291 patients were included, with 663 admitted on high census days and 628 admitted on low census days. Demographics and comorbidities were similar between groups. Surgical fixation rates and time to surgery were similar between census levels. High census admissions had lower ICU admission rates (odds ratio (OR): 0.78, p=0.034) and higher delirium risk (OR: 3.21, p=0.005). CONCLUSION: Despite some seasonal variation between groups, patients admitted on high and low census days have similar demographics and prehospital comorbidities. However, patients admitted on high census days were less likely to receive ICU admission and had increased delirium rates, raising concerns about under-triage and emphasizing the need for improved resource allocation during high-volume periods.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Impact of Trauma Team Census on Patients With Rib Fractures
- Date Crossref
- 20/05/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.