Biorepositories For Global Rare Disease Research: A Narrative Review
Rattachement africain : it, au, in, us, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
PURPOSE OF THIS REVIEW: Rare diseases, although individually infrequent, collectively impact a substantial number of people. Collaborative translational research using biospecimens is essential for advancing our understanding of the diverse characteristics and pathophysiology of rare diseases. Biobanks play a pivotal role in this endeavor by collecting, processing, transporting, and storing biospecimens, thereby serving as invaluable resources for medical research. In this review, we explore currently available biobanks, with a specific focus on those dedicated to rare rheumatic diseases. We also examine accessible best practice guidelines for establishing and maintaining high-quality biobanks, discuss the limitations and propose future directions for enhancing biobanking efforts in rare disease research. RECENT FINDINGS: Advances in molecular and genomic technologies have expanded the role of biobanks, enhancing biomarker discovery and precision medicine. However, despite growth in biobanking capabilities, key challenges persist concerning ethics, interoperability, and biospecimen exchange, prompting active responses by various regulatory and governing bodies. Biobanking has transformed rare disease research. Strengthening national and international collaborations is essential for driving progress in this field and accelerating the development of novel therapeutic and precision medicine approaches.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Biorepositories For Global Rare Disease Research: A Narrative Review
- Date Crossref
- 21/05/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.