Cone-beam versus photon-counting detector CT: Influence of dose variations on the detection of simulated mandibular osseous lesions

Le résumé fourni par la source

This study compared cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) for detecting simulated mandibular osseous lesions, emphasizing lesion detectability, quantitative accuracy, and inter-reader reliability at equivalent radiation doses. Three types of simulated osseous lesions (sequestrum/fracture, cystic lesion, and extended periodontal gap) were evaluated by two readers, across three radiation dose levels: high (360 μSv), standard (122 μSv), and low (20 μSv). Image quality, artifact presence, and lesion detectability were qualitatively evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale (5 = highest to 1 = lowest rating). Lesion dimensions were quantitatively measured. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and weighted kappa for interobserver reliability. High-dose PCD-CT consistently provided the highest image quality, lesion detectability, and minimal artifacts across all lesion types (5 ± 0), achieving perfect inter-reader agreement (100 %). PCD-CT outperformed CBCT in lesion detectability, with the greatest difference at lower doses (3.87 ± 0.35 to 4.83 ± 0.39 vs. 3.13 ± 0.53 to 4.5 ± 0.52). PCD-CT demonstrated superior inter-reader reliability, with perfect agreement for high-dose (κ = 1.0; p < 0.001) and good agreement for standard- and low-dose protocols (κ = 0.909 and κ = 0.744; p < 0.001). Quantitative measurements showed minimal intermodal differences ranging from 0.15 to 0.34 mm, confirming PCD-CT's clinical precision even at low-dose protocols. These findings highlight PCD-CT's potential in dentomaxillofacial imaging, enhancing diagnostic capabilities and reducing radiation exposure.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.