Evidence for Building an Integrated Dementia Healthcare System: A Systematic Review
Résumé fourni par la source
Objectives Proponents of integrated healthcare systems suggest that such system can improve healthcare experience for individuals with dementia by amalgamating personal and structured resources.Methods We assessed systematically available evidence on the current state of integrated healthcare systems viewed in terms of different levels and dimensions of integration, emphasizing multiple stakeholders’ simultaneous perspectives. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they (1) evaluated a health system, (2) adopted a network or integrated care model, (3) cared for individuals with dementia, and (4) provided real-world data.Results Our review included 31 studies. Main components of the healthcare system included care mediation, multidisciplinary care, primary care integration, long-term care, community-based service, digital technology, and one undefined. Most studies involved meso-level integration (n = 23), followed by micro-level (n = 12) and macro-level integration (n = 5).Conclusions Key factors that promote an integrated healthcare system for dementia include supportive organizational structure, multidisciplinary collaboration, effective leadership, clear roles, streamlined referral, and community involvement. Macro-level integration should be considered with greater emphasis in conjunction with both meso- and micro-level integration.Clinical Implications Successful development of comprehensive integrated healthcare network will require thoughtful implementation and transition across all levels of the system.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Evidence for Building an Integrated Dementia Healthcare System: A Systematic Review
- Date Crossref
- 16/05/2025
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.