Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Don’t torque like that

4Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Le résumé fourni par la source

Context. Changes in the rotational period observed in various magnetized accreting sources are generally attributed to the interaction between the infalling plasma and the large-scale magnetic field of the accretor. A number of models have been proposed to link these changes to the mass accretion rate, based on different assumptions on the relevant physical processes and system parameters. For X-ray binaries with neutron stars, with the help of precise measurements of the spin periods provided by current instrumentation, these models provide a way to infer such parameters as the strength of the dipolar field and a distance to the system. Often, the obtained magnetic field strength values contradict those from other methods used to obtain magnetic field estimates. Aims. We want to compare the results of several of the proposed accretion models. To this end, an example application of these models to data was performed. Methods. We reformulated the set of disk accretion torque models in a way that their parameterizations are directly comparable. The application of the reformulated models is discussed and demonstrated using Fermi/GBM and Swift/BAT monitoring data covering several X-ray outbursts of the accreting pulsar 4U 0115+63. Results. We find that most of the models under consideration are able to describe the observations to a high degree of accuracy and with little indication that one model is preferred over the others. Even so, the derived parameters from these models show a large spread. Specifically, the magnetic field strength ranges over one order of magnitude for the different models. This indicates that the results are heavily influenced by systematic uncertainties. Conclusions. The application of torque models provides a generic way to access system parameters of the accreting object. The values obtained via these models must be treated with caution, since the systematics of the models must be taken into account. Our example suggests that the current state of analytic torque models does not allow for quantitative measurements of the magnetic field of an accreting object. Systematic application to a sample of sources with known magnetic fields and distances will provide a selection criterion between models in the future.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Don’t torque like that
Date Crossref
01/06/2025
Éditeur
EDP Sciences
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les sujets associés

Scientific Research and DiscoveriesAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.