Genomic changes of Lassa virus associated with mammalian host adaptation
Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Lassa virus (LASV) causes a severe haemorrhagic fever in humans, with estimates of 100,000 to 300,000 infections annually in endemic regions and accounting for around 5000 deaths. The natural reservoir is the Mastomys rat, but through zoonotic transmissions humans are accidental hosts. Regular outbreaks continue to exert pressures on public health systems, with its ability to cause nosocomial infections posing risks to healthcare workers. It is a concern that larger outbreaks and introduction of LASV to new territories will intensify, including risk of adaptation to new mammalian host reservoirs. RESULTS: To evaluate genetic changes in LASV during adaptation to a new host, a guinea pig model of infection was utilised. Initial infection with LASV stocks cultured from cell culture resulted in only mild or subclinical disease. To study the susceptibility in naïve animals, the virus was serially passaged which increased clinical signs during disease progression ultimately resulting in severe disease. An RNAseq and consensus mapping approach was undertaken to evaluate nucleotide changes in LASV genome from each animal at each passage. CONCLUSIONS: During adaptation to guinea pigs, no significant new mutations occurred. Instead, a selection pressure on two genes of the L segment was observed resulting in their increased frequency in the genome population during passaging.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Genomic changes of Lassa virus associated with mammalian host adaptation
- Date Crossref
- 15/05/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.