Developing Elite Strength and Conditioning Coaches’ Practice Through Facilitated Reflection
Rattachement africain : gb, ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Recent research has suggested that strength and conditioning (S&C) coach development should consider constructivist learning theories to promote coach development and learning of psychosocial coaching competencies. Reflective practice can encourage holistic learning through promoting an internal dialogue of the meaningfulness of an individual’s experiences. Our study aimed to examine the efficacy of a facilitated, guided, and longitudinal reflective process to promote coach learning of psychosocial coaching practice using Moon’s reflective framework. Over a four-week period, six elite S&C coaches engaged in a guided process reflection process with a facilitator. This included daily journaling in an e-diary with the facilitator providing feedback at the end of each week. At the end, each S&C coach participated in an exit interview. Data were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Findings revealed that there were potential benefits for the S&C coach’s process of reflection such as providing accountability through developing a close relationship with the facilitator, which enabled the S&C coaches to more critically link learning to behaviour change. Furthermore, S&C coaches’ learning resulted in developing awareness of self/athlete’s needs, increased flexibility, and enhanced confidence. This resulted in S&C coaches developing psychosocial coaching competencies that enabled them to change their practice to become more athlete centred.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Developing Elite Strength and Conditioning Coaches’ Practice Through Facilitated Reflection
- Date Crossref
- 14/05/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Hartpury University Hartpury Sport pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Cape Breton University Department of Experiental Studies in Community and Sport pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Winchester Department of Sport pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Hartpury Sport — Hartpury University, Department of Experiental Studies in Community and Sport — Cape Breton University et Department of Sport — University of Winchester.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.