Clinical presentation of Enterovirus D68 in adults with acute respiratory infections consulting in emergency departments in Quebec, Canada
Rattachement africain : ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Objectives: Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) is mainly studied in children, while data in adults are limited. We described the clinical presentation of EV-D68 in adults, compared with other enterovirus/rhinovirus (EV/RV) infections. Methods: We used clinical and laboratory data from 1143 adults visiting four emergency departments in Quebec, Canada, for acute respiratory infections (February 2022 to March 2023). We analyzed nasopharyngeal swabs using a multiplex polymerase chain reaction; positive EV/RV samples were further tested with EV-D68-specific polymerase chain reaction assays. We calculated the Pandemic Medical Early Warning Score (PMEWS) to assess severity. Results: = 0.02) and tended to have more underlying chronic respiratory diseases (26% vs 20%) and respiratory symptoms (e.g., dyspnea: 84% vs 75%; wheezing: 63% vs 44%; and chest pain: 63% vs 49%), although these differences were not statistically significant. PMEWS, hospitalizations, and median time spent in the emergency department did not differ significantly between the EV-D68 and the other EV/RV group. Conclusions: Respiratory symptoms tended to be more common among participants with EV-D68 than those with other EV/RV, although disease severity was similar. Larger studies are needed to better characterize EV-D68 infections in adults.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Clinical presentation of Enterovirus D68 in adults with acute respiratory infections consulting in emergency departments in Quebec, Canada
- Date Crossref
- 01/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.