Guy’s Cancer Cohort: Guy’s Cancer Centre’s Real-World Evidence Programme 5 years later
Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: As the burden of cancer rises, the value of real-world data in addressing clinically relevant research questions is increasingly recognised. The Guy's Cancer Real-World Evidence Programme, initiated in 2018 at Guy's and St Thomas' Trust (GSTT), informs decision making and local policy. Within this programme, the Guy's Cancer Cohort (GCC) database has amplified real-world evidence (RWE) capabilities and improved data internalisation. GCC was renewed by the Research Ethics Committee in May 2023 (Ref: 23/NW/0105) and expanded to include patients investigated for new or recurrent cancer. Construction and content: GCC includes patients investigated, diagnosed, and/or treated for cancer, enabling case-control studies and the exploration of factors linked to cancer diagnosis. Annually, ∼8000 cancers are diagnosed at Guy's Cancer Centre. Only pseudonymised data are processed, and the database aligns with the National Health Service national opt-out scheme. Clinical data captured include demographics, tumour characteristics, treatments, quality of life, and imaging data. Conclusions: GCC provides essential infrastructure to explore clinical, mechanistic, and supportive care research questions. Its renewal and expansion optimise data collection and linkage, improving patient care and outcomes. Applications for pseudonymised datasets can be directed to cancerdata@gstt.nhs.uk.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Guy’s Cancer Cohort: Guy’s Cancer Centre’s Real-World Evidence Programme 5 years later
- Date Crossref
- 01/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.