Effect of pressure-controlled ventilation and volume-controlled ventilation for laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) are commonly used in laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position, and pressure-controlled ventilation volume guaranteed (PCV-VG) has been increasingly used recently. However, there is still no consensus on the optimal ventilation mode. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the effects of different ventilation modes for laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position. Multiple databases were searched for randomized controlled trials published before December 2024 to compare the effects of PCV, PCV-VG, and VCV in patients in the Trendelenburg position who underwent laparoscopic surgery. The primary outcomes included peak airway pressure (Ppeak), plateau airway pressure (Pplat), dynamic compliance (Cdyn), and blood gas analysis. Sixteen studies were included in this meta-analysis. PCV [Ppeak, 15‒40-min post-pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position (T2): mean difference ( MD ) − 4.28, 95% confidence interval ( CI ) − 5.91 to − 2.64, P < 0.01; 60-min post-pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position (T3): MD − 4.51, 95% CI − 5.41 to − 3.6, P < 0.01; 120-min post-pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position (T4): MD − 5.63, 95% CI − 7.35 to − 3.91, P < 0.01; Cydn, T2: MD 3.15, 1.53 to 4.77, P = 0.0001; T3: MD 2.78, 95% CI 1.43 to 4.14, P < 0.01] and PCV-VG (Ppeak, T2: MD − 3.99, 95% CI − 7.2 to − 0.78, P = 0.01; T3: MD − 3.46, 95% CI − 6.5 to − 0.42, P = 0.03; Cydn, T3: MD 4.44, 95% CI 2.23 to 6.66, P < 0.01; T4: MD 3.61, 95% CI 1.31 to 5.91, P = 0.002) significantly reduced Ppeak and improved Cydn compared with VCV after pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position. PaO 2 , pH, and PaO 2 /FiO 2 did not differ between PCV and VCV or between PCV-VG and VCV during intraoperative surgery. Our meta-analysis suggests that in laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position, PCV or PCV-VG can provide a lower Ppeak and higher Cdyn throughout surgery but cannot offer better oxygenation than VCV. PCV or PCV-VG might be optimal for laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Effect of pressure-controlled ventilation and volume-controlled ventilation for laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Date Crossref
- 13/05/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Chongqing University Department of Anesthesiology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Chongqing Cancer Hospital pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
Department of Anesthesiology — Chongqing University et Chongqing Cancer Hospital.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.