The Impact of Hospital Volunteers’ Health Promotion Programs on Health Literacy and Quality of Life

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: This study investigated whether a health literacy intervention program could improve the health literacy and quality of life among hospital volunteers. The study also explored the impact of health literacy on hospital volunteers’ health and psychological well-being. Methods: Overall, 35 hospital volunteers were recruited and divided into an experimental group (n = 22) and a control group (n = 13). The experimental group participated in an 8-week health literacy intervention program, which covered topics such as medication information, physiological and symptom-related vocabulary, and disease representation. The control group did not receive any intervention. A questionnaire survey was conducted to assess participants’ health literacy and quality of life before and after the intervention, and the comparison between two groups was statistically analyzed. Results: The experimental group showed significant improvements in multiple aspects of health literacy, particularly in medication information, physiology vocabulary, symptom vocabulary, and signs vocabulary (p < 0.05). In terms of quality of life, the experimental group demonstrated significant enhancements in psychological well-being and overall quality of life (p < 0.05). In contrast, the control group exhibited a downward trend in most health literacy dimensions with a significant decline in organ vocabulary (p < 0.05) and no significant changes in quality of life. Conclusions: The health literacy intervention program effectively improved hospital volunteers’ health literacy and quality of life with particularly notable effects on psychological well-being and the understanding of health-related professional terminology. By enhancing hospital volunteers’ health literacy and quality of life, healthcare organizations can foster more effective, sustainable, and satisfactory service quality.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.