Updates on corneal neurotization surgery to enhance treatment of the neurotrophic cornea
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction Although novel drugs are approved or under investigation, corneal neurotization (CN) represents the only curative surgical technique for neurotrophic keratopathy (NK).Areas covered Characteristics and outcomes of all clinical studies focused on CN, putting the light on surgical procedure, technical refinements, donor nerve selection and timing of the surgery.Expert opinion The choice of direct versus indirect approach and the selection of donor nerve should be reached according to patient condition, surgeon experience, equipment and interdisciplinary team availability. In selected cases, processed nerve allografts may allow shorter operative time, smaller surgical team and earlier sensation recovery but the risk of failure in longer gaps and issues related to cost, availability and storage should be considered. The endoscopic approach could provide advantages over both direct CN for the lower invasiveness and indirect CN for the avoidance of donor site morbidity; however, the steep learning curve and the risk of isolating an inadequate nerve length have limited its adoption. Ideally, CN should be considered after the failure of conservative treatments but before the formation of irreversible corneal opacity. Future studies should explore novel noncontact methods for evaluating corneal sensitivity and the synergistic use of neurotrophic factors for enhancing postoperative nerve regeneration.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Updates on corneal neurotization surgery to enhance treatment of the neurotrophic cornea
- Date Crossref
- 16/05/2025
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.