Pipeline embolization in patients with hemoglobinopathies: A cohort study

Résumé fourni par la source

IntroductionFlow diversion with the pipeline embolization device (PED) is an effective endovascular treatment. However, the metal surface's thrombogenicity and need for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) are notable limitations. Few prior studies have reported specifically on flow diverters' safety in patients with hemoglobinopathies, a population at increased risk of thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications.MethodsNatural language processing queried our institution's medical records for intracranial embolization procedures from 2014 to 2024, screening for "hemoglobinopathy," "thalassemia," and "sickle cell." Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed.ResultsSixteen procedures in 14 patients were identified in which a mean 2.0 PEDs per patient were used. Most patients were female (71.4%). Median age was 48.8 years. Five patients had sickle cell disease, two had sickle cell trait, two had sickle cell or hemoglobin C trait and alpha thalassemia minor, and five had alpha thalassemia minor. The 14 patients were treated for 20 aneurysms; four treatments covered two distinct aneurysms. Median dome size per treatment was 4.0 mm. Of the 16 aneurysm treatments, five (31.2%) treated an irregular aneurysm. Most (56.2%) treatments used multiple PEDs. All patients were discharged on DAPT after verifying effect with P2Y12 assays. Follow-up DSA, CTA, or MRA was obtained in 12/14 (85.7%) patients at a median 1.6 years. Complete occlusion was achieved in all aneurysms. Clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients at a median 2.2 years. There were no thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complications, neurological deficits, or mortalities.ConclusionPipeline embolization can safely and effectively treat patients with hemoglobinopathies.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.