How consistent is ‘the dynamic gut’? Complex physiological responses to dietary fiber and protein across three rodent species
Résumé fourni par la source
To efficiently digest food resources that may vary spatially and temporally, animals maintain physiological flexibility across levels of organization. For example, in response to dietary shifts, animals may exhibit changes in the expression of digestive enzymes, the size of digestive organs or the structure of their gut microbiome. A 'Grand Challenge' in comparative physiology is to understand how components of flexibility across organizational levels may scale to cumulatively determine organismal performance. Here, we conducted feeding trials on three rodent species with disparate feeding strategies: herbivorous montane voles (Microtus montanus), omnivorous white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) and carnivorous grasshopper mice (Onychomys torridus). For each species, four groups of individuals were presented with diets that varied in carbohydrate, fiber and protein content. After 4-5 weeks, we measured organismal performance in the form of nutrient digestibility (dry matter, nitrogen, fiber). We also measured gut anatomy and organ size, and conducted enzyme assays on various tissues to measure activities of carbohydrases and peptidases. We found some shared physiological responses, e.g. fiber generally increased gut size across species. However, the specifics of these responses were distinct across species, suggesting different capacities for flexibility. Thus, in the context of digestion, we still lack an understanding of how flexibility across organizational levels may scale to determine whole-animal performance.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- How consistent is ‘the dynamic gut’? Complex physiological responses to dietary fiber and protein across three rodent species
- Date Crossref
- 20/06/2025
- Éditeur
- The Company of Biologists
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.