Aller au contenu principal
2025 conference-abstract

Is Equitable Priority Vaccination of Vulnerable People Feasible in a Real-World Context? The Case of Belgium

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : be. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background: Belgium is the only country to have implemented a comprehensive, proactive, and equitable strategy to prioritize vaccination at population level during the COVID-19 pandemic. This prioritization targeted individuals with pre-existing health conditions, who were at increased risk of severe COVID-19. They were identified through both centralized (Health Insurance Funds database) and decentralized (Electronic Health Records from Family Physicians) data as high-risk. We aimed to evaluate whether prioritized groups were vaccinated sooner, and which socio-demographic and -economic characteristics were related to the speed of vaccine uptake.Methods: We calculated the time to vaccination between the start of the prioritization (1st April 2021) and receiving a first COVID-19 vaccine dose, using this interval as a proxy for evaluating the strategy's early impact. A multivariate regression model, incorporating priority status, age, sex, region of residence, income, and migration background, described the natural logarithm of this time gap. The data was obtained through the LINK-VACC project.Results: The sample included 4,517,802 individuals vaccinated between 1st April and 31st December 2021, of which 26.3% were prioritized. The results show a 34.7 days earlier vaccination for prioritized individuals versus non-prioritized ones. The time difference between the prioritized and non-prioritized groups was larger in younger age groups compared to older age groups (27.7 days versus 19.3 days). Based on the multivariate model estimates, being prioritized (β_priority= -0.3, 95%CI (-0.38;-0.36)), older age (β_(55-64)= -0.56, 95%CI(-0.57;-0.55)), residency in Brussels or Wallonia (β_Brussels= -0.18, 95%CI(-0.20;-0.16);β_Wallonia= -0.18, 95%CI(-0.19;-0.17)), having a high income (β_(high income)= -0.11, 95%CI(-0.12;-0.10)), being a Belgian national (β_belgian= reference) and being female (β_female= reference) are associated with a shorter time to vaccination.Conclusion: Developing and implementing a prioritization vaccination strategy accelerated vaccination for the high-risk population with health conditions, demonstrating its feasibility in promoting equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Is Equitable Priority Vaccination of Vulnerable People Feasible in a Real-World Context? The Case of Belgium
Date Crossref
01/05/2025
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

COVID-19 epidemiological studiesVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.