Research on Predicting Gas–Solid Erosion in Series Elbows Using Interpretable Machine Learning
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Erosion in industrial pipelines is inevitable, making accurate prediction essential for ensuring equipment safety. This study employs interpretable machine learning models to predict erosion in serial elbows under gas–solid flow conditions. A predictive model was developed by integrating computational fluid dynamics (CFD) with the Euler–Lagrange method. Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) was applied to five key factors influencing pipeline erosion rates (ER). Five tree-based ensemble machine learning models were selected, optimized using grid search, and subsequently employed to predict the wall-averaged and maximum erosion rates at both upstream and downstream elbows in serial pipelines. To analyze feature interactions, correlation analysis, Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), and response surface methods were utilized. Results indicate that the optimized CatBoost model demonstrated high accuracy in predicting gas–solid erosion in serial elbows, while SHAP analysis enhanced model interpretability. In combination with correlation and response surface analyses, both qualitative and quantitative evaluations of factor interactions were conducted. This study improves the predictive capability and interpretability of industrial pipeline erosion modeling, offering valuable insights for erosion prevention and control in industrial applications.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Research on Predicting Gas–Solid Erosion in Series Elbows Using Interpretable Machine Learning
- Date Crossref
- 30/05/2025
- Éditeur
- ASME International
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.