Higher incidence of trocar site hernia with gallbladder extraction via umbilical versus epigastric trocar port: a multicentre retrospective analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Trocar site hernia (TSH) is a known complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Gallbladder extraction is typically performed through the umbilical or epigastric trocar port. However, data on the incidence of TSH in relation to the extraction site is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the need for surgical repair of TSH following gallbladder extraction through the umbilical versus epigastric trocar port. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted across two Dutch general hospitals. It assessed the occurrence of TSH after LC and examined commonly described risk factors in relation to the TSH location. RESULTS: Among 2 377 patients that underwent LC, the extraction site of the gallbladder was known in 1756 patients. Gallbladder extraction was performed via the umbilical trocar port in 929 (53%) of cases and via the epigastric trocar port in 827 (47%) of cases. TSH repair was required in 36 (2.1%) patients, with a higher incidence in patients with gallbladder extraction through the umbilical trocar port (3.2%) compared to the epigastric trocar port (0.7%), (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The need for operative repair of a TSH after a LC is significantly reduced when the gallbladder is retrieved through the epigastric trocar site port compared to the umbilical trocar site port.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Higher incidence of trocar site hernia with gallbladder extraction via umbilical versus epigastric trocar port: a multicentre retrospective analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy
- Date Crossref
- 08/05/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.