Attention as the primary cognitive domain affected in post-myocardial infarction cognitive impairment: a prospective multicenter study
Rattachement africain : be, pl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
We analysed cognitive impairment (CI) during the peri-myocardial infarction (MI) period and after 6 months. The study included 326 patients. Cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Clock Drawing Test (CDT). Routine laboratory and echocardiography data were collected. We distinguished 4 groups of patients: 1 - CI present peri-infarction and after 6 months; 2 - CI present only peri-infarction; 3 - CI present only after 6 months; 4 - without CI. Groups constituted 8.9%, 16.3%, 7.7% and 67.1% of participants (as assessed by MMSE), respectively. In those who improved (group 2) or with worsened cognitive function (group 3), analogous changes in attention function occurred. There was a group of patients with CI on the MMSE who performed the CDT correctly, 12% peri-infarct and 11% at 6-month follow-up, respectively. Patients with a normal CDT score but CI found in the MMSE had impaired attention function. Cognitive function improves in some patients, and deteriorates in others after MI. The uniform type of impaired cognitive function allows us to assume a uniform etiology of CI. Performing the CDT and using the MMSE component assessing attention could prove sufficient for the initial assessment of cognitive functions in patients after MI.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Attention as the primary cognitive domain affected in post-myocardial infarction cognitive impairment: a prospective multicenter study
- Date Crossref
- 08/05/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.