Respectful Newborn Care Mixed-Methods Scoping Review Protocol v1
Rattachement africain : us, be, gb, au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Newborns have the right to high-quality health care, including both the provision and experience of care. Experience of care—how care is provided, not just what is provided—encompasses the extent to which care is delivered with respect and dignity. It is increasingly recognized as a core component of quality, with implications for newborns’ immediate and long-term health and development, as well as future care utilization. Respectful maternity care has addressed important elements of the newborn experience, often through maternal and family-centered perspectives. While the experiences of mothers and newborns are closely linked, providing high-quality care to both and protecting the mother-newborn dyad requires understanding what constitutes respectful care from the newborn’s own perspective. However, the concept of respectful newborn care has remained underdeveloped. This scoping review builds on prior research that has laid important groundwork for exploring and defining the concept of respectful newborn care. We will conduct a scoping review to identify all studies that have explored and measured respectful newborn care and extract a list of respectful newborn care components. These components will be mapped against an updated respectful newborn care typology developed in an earlier scoping review to refine the updated typology and identify research gaps.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Respectful Newborn Care Mixed-Methods Scoping Review Protocol v1
- Date Crossref
- 06/05/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.