Multi-Level Dynamic Weight Optimization Scheduling Strategy for Flexible Interconnected Distribution Substations Based on Three-Port SNOPs
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
By using a soft normal open point (SNOP) to connect multiple distribution networks to form a flexible interconnected distribution system (FIDS), the power distribution can be flexibly and controllably regulated among distribution stations, but it is also necessary to ensure the system’s operational efficiency and maintain voltage quality when carrying out optimal scheduling. In this paper, a FIDS optimal scheduling strategy considering dynamic weight grading is proposed. By considering the voltage overrun status of each distribution station area, the voltage level of each distribution station area is divided into three voltage overrun situations, including normal operation, safe boundary, and protection boundary levels, and an optimal scheduling model applicable to the multi-level operation of the FIDS is constructed. In order to adapt to the coordinated optimal operation objectives under different overrun levels, an optimal operation strategy considering the dynamic weights of system operation cost, voltage deviation, customer satisfaction, and SNOP regulation capability is proposed and finally simulated and verified using the improved IEEE33 node arithmetic case. The results verify the effectiveness of the method proposed in this paper in improving the system’s operational efficiency and node voltage quality.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Multi-Level Dynamic Weight Optimization Scheduling Strategy for Flexible Interconnected Distribution Substations Based on Three-Port SNOPs
- Date Crossref
- 08/05/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.