DIST: Distance-based Inference of Species Trees
Résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT Inferring species trees from concatenated loci is often criticised for failing to account for gene tree discordance – particularly when using character-based methods. However, this criticism does not apply to distance-based concatenation trees, which can be shown to be statistically consistent even in anomaly zones. Building on this insight, we introduce DIST (Distance-based Inference of Species Trees), an intuitive and scalable method that infers species trees from population-level distance matrices containing multi-locus estimates of D xy , F ST or coalescence units ( τ ). DIST derives these values from between-individual sequence dissimilarity estimates, E(p) , using basic equations from coalescence theory. Under certain conditions, DIST can also quantify gene tree discordance and distinguish whether it arises from gene flow or incomplete lineage sorting alone. While conceptually related to more sophisticated summary methods, DIST differs in that it does not seek the species tree which best explains a set of gene trees. Instead, it searches for the species tree which best explains an average gene tree, of which all branch lengths reflect mean coalescence time, E(t) . Although this average gene tree is rarely observed empirically, it is approximated by an individual-level distance-based tree, traditionally referred to as a ‘tree of individuals’. The DIST algorithm is implemented in the R package SambaR , which now accepts input in the form of pairwise E ( p) estimates.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- DIST: Distance-based Inference of Species Trees
- Date Crossref
- 08/05/2025
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.