Molecular mechanisms and consequences of TDP-43 phosphorylation in neurodegeneration

Le résumé fourni par la source

Increased phosphorylation of TDP-43 is a pathological hallmark of several neurodegenerative disorders, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). However, the regulation and roles of TDP-43 phosphorylation remain incompletely understood. A variety of techniques have been utilized to understand TDP-43 phosphorylation, including kinase/phosphatase manipulation, phosphomimic variants, and genetic, physical, or chemical inducement in a variety of cell cultures and animal models, and via analyses of post-mortem human tissues. These studies have produced conflicting results: suggesting incongruously that TDP-43 phosphorylation may either drive disease progression or serve a neuroprotective role. In this review, we explore the roles of regulators of TDP-43 phosphorylation including the putative TDP-43 kinases c-Abl, CDC7, CK1, CK2, IKKβ, p38α/MAPK14, MEK1, TTBK1, and TTBK2, and TDP-43 phosphatases PP1, PP2A, and PP2B, in disease. Building on recent studies, we also examine the consequences of TDP-43 phosphorylation on TDP-43 pathology, especially related to TDP-43 mislocalisation, liquid-liquid phase separation, aggregation, and neurotoxicity. By comparing conflicting findings from various techniques and models, this review highlights both the discrepancies and unresolved aspects in the understanding of TDP-43 phosphorylation. We propose that the role of TDP-43 phosphorylation is site and context dependent, and includes regulation of liquid-liquid phase separation, subcellular mislocalisation, and degradation. We further suggest that greater consideration of the normal functions of the regulators of TDP-43 phosphorylation that may be perturbed in disease is warranted. This synthesis aims to build towards a comprehensive understanding of the complex role of TDP-43 phosphorylation in the pathogenesis of neurodegeneration.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.