Longitudinal and cross-sectional selection on flowering traits in a self-incompatible annual
Rattachement africain : us, ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Net selection on a trait reflects the association of phenotype to fitness, across an entire life cycle. This longitudinal estimate of selection can be viewed as the summation of selection episodes, each characterized by a cross-sectional estimate. Selection may be consistent in direction and strength across episodes for some traits, fluctuating in others, and for some, concentrated in a single intense event. Additionally, while selection on plant reproductive traits is predicted to be stronger through male fitness than female fitness, male fitness remains less studied. We investigated how selection on flowering traits in Brassica rapa varied temporally and spatially by measuring male reproductive fitness in four experimental populations with two spatial arrangements. To estimate longitudinal and cross-sectional selection, we introduced plants at successive intervals within a single reproductive season. We genotyped over 3000 plants and calculated selection on flowering time, duration, and total flowers. Cross-sectional analyses revealed directional selection was common, but patterns were masked by longitudinal estimates. Spatial population arrangement significantly impacted pollen movement, demonstrating how breeding timing and spatial aggregation interact to create complex evolutionary dynamics.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Longitudinal and cross-sectional selection on flowering traits in a self-incompatible annual
- Date Crossref
- 07/05/2025
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.