Acceptance of illness and its relationship with benefit finding among patients with colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy: A latent profile analysis
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Objective: This study aimed to identify the potential profiles of acceptance of illness among colorectal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, examine the factors influencing these profiles, and analyze the relationship between acceptance of illness in different profiles and benefit finding. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 475 parents with colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy in southwest China from June to November 2024. Data were collected using general information questionnaire, the Acceptance of Illness Scale (AIS), and the Benefit Finding Scale (BFS). Use descriptive statistics, latent profile analysis, and multivariate logistic regression to analyze the data, while multiple linear regression was used to examine the impact of different categories of acceptance of illness on benefit finding. Results: < 0.001). Conclusions: The acceptance of illness among colorectal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy exhibits heterogeneity and can be categorized into three latent profiles. Higher acceptance of illness among patients is associated with a higher level of benefit finding. Health care providers should implement targeted interventions based on the influencing factors of different categories of acceptance of illness to enhance benefit finding levels.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Acceptance of illness and its relationship with benefit finding among patients with colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy: A latent profile analysis
- Date Crossref
- 01/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.