End-of-Life Care Competency in Long-term Care Facilities for Care Providers in Thailand: A Delphi Study
Rattachement africain : th, jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The global shift toward an aging population, evident in Thailand, highlights the critical need for end-of-life care (EOLC) competencies among care providers in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). As the number of older people requiring complex and compassionate care at the end of life continues to rise, the competencies required for care providers in Thai LTCFs remain underexplored. This study aimed to identify the key competencies required to deliver effective EOLC in Thai LTCFs. A Delphi method was used, engaging a panel of 12 experts, including nurses, academics, and LTCF managers. The study achieved consensus on 7 core competencies, encompassing 32 subcompetencies essential for high-quality EOLC. These competencies include knowledge of EOLC, caregiving skills, communication, leadership, innovation, ethical decision-making, and professional development. This study provides a culturally relevant framework for EOLC competencies in Thai LTCFs, emphasizing the importance of integrating technical and interpersonal skills to enhance the quality of care for older people in their final stages of life. These findings can inform educational programs and policy development, ensuring that care providers are adequately prepared to meet the complex needs of this vulnerable population.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- End-of-Life Care Competency in Long-term Care Facilities for Care Providers in Thailand: A Delphi Study
- Date Crossref
- 28/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.