Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Comparison Between Efficacy of Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine Boluses for Prevention of Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension in Obstetrical Patients Undergoing Emergency Cesarean Section

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : pk. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension (SAH) is a common complication during emergency cesarean sections, which can negatively affect both maternal and neonatal outcomes. This study aims to compare the efficacy of norepinephrine and phenylephrine boluses in preventing SAH in obstetric patients. Objective: To compare the efficacy of norepinephrine and phenylephrine boluses for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension (SAH) in obstetric patients undergoing emergency cesarean section. Methods: A double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted at Dr. Ruth K.M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi, Dow University of Health Sciences, from 1st January 2025 to 31st March 2025. A total of 124 obstetric patients undergoing emergency cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned into two groups: norepinephrine (N) and phenylephrine (P). Each group consisted of 62 patients. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension following spinal anesthesia, while secondary outcomes included the need for additional vasopressor boluses, maternal and neonatal outcomes, and side effects. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square tests, with a p-value <0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The overall incidence of hypotension was 58 (46.77%). The rate of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension was significantly higher in the phenylephrine group compared to the norepinephrine group (56.45% vs. 37.1%; p=0.031). The proportion of infants with an Apgar score <7 at one minute was significantly higher in the phenylephrine group than in the norepinephrine group (33.9% vs. 6.5%; p=0.0005). Conclusion: A prophylactic bolus dose of norepinephrine demonstrated superior efficacy compared to phenylephrine for the prevention of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in parturients undergoing emergency cesarean section.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Comparison Between Efficacy of Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine Boluses for Prevention of Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension in Obstetrical Patients Undergoing Emergency Cesarean Section
Date Crossref
30/04/2025
Éditeur
Medeye Publishers
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Anesthesia and Pain ManagementNausea and vomiting managementAirway Management and Intubation Techniques

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.