comparative analysis: Success rates of Endoscopic Endonasal versus External Dacryocystorhinostomy with silicon tube.

Résumé fourni par la source

Introduction: Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is a standard surgical treatment for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. it can be performed via external (E-DCR) or internal (EE-DCR) approaches, with each offering distinct advantages. E- DCR is well-established with high success rates but requires a longer recovery time. EE-DCR, being minimal invasive, Offers a faster recovery and better cosmetic outcomes, though requires longer recovery time. This study compares the anatomical and functional outcomes of EE-DCR and E-DCR with silicon tube. Setting: This study was conducted at Ziauddin Hospital, Karachi, over a period of 5 years, from 1st July 2019 to 30th June 2024. Ethical approval was obtained from institutional review board (Ethical approval code: 9330924AKOPT, dated October 28, 2024.) Material and Methods: A total of 140 patients were included, divided into two groups of 70 each, EE-DCR and E-DCR. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 18-70 with nasolacrimal duct obstruction and a follow-up of at least one year. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 23, with significance level of p < 0.05. Outcomes such as nasolacrimal duct patency and symptom improvement were assessed during follow-up at 1st day, 1st week, 1st month, 3rd month, 6th month and 1 year. Results: The mean age of patients was seen as 42.43 ± 10.9 years in EE-DCR and 49.00 ± 9.01 years in E-DCR group. Anatomical success rates for both groups at 3, 6 and 12 months were comparable, with no statistically significant difference (p-value > 0.05). At 3rf month, 87.14% of the EE-DCR patients and 91.43% of E-DCR patients showed nasolacrimal duct patency. Similarly, functional success rates were assessed showing 84.29% of EE-DCR and 87.14% of E-DCR patients were symptom- free at 3rd month. Conclusion: Both EE-DCR and E-DCR are effective treatments for nasolacrimal duct obstruction.EE-DCR offers advantages like faster recovery and fewer complications, while E-DCR remains reliable for complex cases. Keywords: Dacryocystitis, External Dacryocystorhinostomy, Endonasal Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.