Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Epidemiology of unintended pregnancies: regional insights from sub-Saharan Africa

4Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Unintended pregnancy remains a significant public health issue globally, with sub-Saharan Africa experiencing a particularly severe burden. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and determinants of unintended pregnancy across 35 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Data were obtained from the Demographic and Health Surveys (n = 373,298). Unintended pregnancies were defined as those that were either mistimed (i.e., occurring earlier than desired) or unwanted (i.e., not desired at all). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data, and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the association between sociodemographic factors and unintended pregnancy. The analyses were conducted using Stata 16 software, with survey weights applied to account for the complex survey design. Descriptive analysis revealed that 27.6% of women reported their last pregnancy as unintended, with significant regional variation. The highest prevalence of unintended pregnancies was observed in South Africa (57.9%), while the lowest was in Burkina Faso (9.8%). In general, rural areas had a higher prevalence of unintended pregnancies compared to urban areas. Regression analysis identified significant sociodemographic factors associated with unintended pregnancy. Women in rural areas had lower odds of unintended pregnancy compared to urban residents (OR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.91–0.95). However, women with primary education were more likely to experience unintended pregnancies compared to those with no education (OR = 2.02, 95% CI 1.98–2.06), and those in the richest wealth quintile had significantly lower odds than those in the poorest quintile (OR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.79–0.84). Contraceptive use was also strongly associated with unintended pregnancy: women using no contraceptive method had 1.74 times higher odds of unintended pregnancy compared to those using modern methods (OR = 1.74, 95% CI 1.71–1.77). This study underscores the need for targeted, evidence-based interventions that address the sociodemographic factors contributing to unintended pregnancies in sub-Saharan Africa. Interventions should focus on improving access to contraceptive methods, promoting education, reducing socioeconomic disparitiesinequalities, and increasing media access to better inform reproductive health decisions. These efforts can help mitigate the high prevalence of unintended pregnancies in the region.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Epidemiology of unintended pregnancies: regional insights from sub-Saharan Africa
Date Crossref
02/05/2025
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesReproductive Health and ContraceptionGlobal Maternal and Child Health

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.