Evaluating Pulmonary Arterial Pressure in Angus Yearling Bulls at High Elevation: Associations with Birth Traits and Growth Performance
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The objectives of this study were to model the relationship between pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) estimates and birth weight, gestation length, and growth traits of developing bulls. Pulmonary arterial pressure estimates were collected from Angus yearling bulls ranging in age from 12 to 18 months from a Montana-based Angus operation (>1600 m elevation, 5406 yearlings/18-month-old bulls from 2016–2023). Pulmonary arterial pressure was positively correlated with birth weight (p < 0.01) and gestation length (p < 0.01). No relationship was observed between bull PAP and weaning weight (p = 0.26). Pulmonary arterial pressure scores were negatively correlated with yearling weight (p = 0.04). Additionally, PAP estimates were negatively correlated with birth-to-weaning gains (p < 0.01) and weaning-to-yearling gains (p = 0.02). Lastly, PAP scores were negatively correlated with birth to yearling growth (p < 0.01). Sire lines influenced offspring PAP scores (p < 0.01), and dam−sire lines tended to have an effect on offspring PAP scores (p = 0.09). In summary, PAP scores were related to birth weight, gestation length, yearling weight, and growth from birth to yearling age. Our findings suggest that selection for higher growth should also emphasize selecting for lower PAP scores.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Evaluating Pulmonary Arterial Pressure in Angus Yearling Bulls at High Elevation: Associations with Birth Traits and Growth Performance
- Date Crossref
- 30/04/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.