Serum Calprotectin as a Novel Biomarker of Disease Severity and Activity in Systemic Sclerosis Patients
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
A monocentric cross-sectional study was performed to investigate the role of serum calprotectin as a biomarker for disease severity and activity in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Serum calprotectin was measured in 74 consecutive SSc patients admitted to a tertiary hospital in Rome, and in 50 healthy controls (HCs) who were healthcare workers, using Aptiva’s particle-based multianalyte technology. In SSc patients, a statistically significant correlation was found between calprotectin and the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) (r = 0.402, p < 0.001), disease activity index (DAI) (r = 0.420, p < 0.001), disease severity scale (DSS) (r = 0.365, p < 0.01), forced vital capacity (FVC) (r = −0.459, p < 0.001), and diffusion lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) (r = −0.445, p < 0.001). Calprotectin was higher in SSc patients with digital ulcers (DUs) than in SSc patients without DUs [2.98 mcg/mL (IQR 2.07;4.29) vs. 2.08 mcg/mL (IQR 1.71;2.45), p < 0.01] and in SSc patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) compared to SSc patients without ILD [2.56 mcg/mL (IQR 1.94;3.03) vs. 1.96 mcg/mL (IQR 1.7;2.35), p < 0.01]. The multivariable stepwise logistic regression analysis showed calprotectin to be independently associated with DUs [OR 2.531 (CI 95%: 1.074;5.961), p < 0.05] and ILD [OR 3.687 (CI 95%: 1.336;10.170), p < 0.05] in SSc patients. Serum calprotectin is associated with DUs and ILD in SSc patients.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Serum Calprotectin as a Novel Biomarker of Disease Severity and Activity in Systemic Sclerosis Patients
- Date Crossref
- 01/05/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.